In today’s technology-driven world, many organizational processes and activities have transitioned from traditional pen-and-paper methods to sophisticated online platforms—assessments being one of them.
The choice between these two evaluation methods can significantly impact key aspects of your talent management, learning and development (L&D), and organizational development (OD) initiatives, namely:
- Efficiency
- Data accuracy
- Decision-making
To help you select the right one, we’ll delve into the advantages and limitations of online assessments vs. pen-and-paper, as understanding them is essential when formulating the best approach for your organization.
Understanding online assessments
To start, we’ll tackle the intricacies of online assessments.
What is an online assessment?
These digital tools designed for the following purposes:
- Ensure you’re able to accurately measure an individual’s skills, knowledge, competencies, and behaviors
- Allow you to maximize various testing formats, including multiple-choice questions, simulations, interactive scenarios, and more
- Let you provide streamlined experiences for both administrators and participants
Such online instruments can be used in different contexts as well, whether it be education, recruitment, or professional development:
- Online evaluation platforms, for instance, let you measure a learner’s understanding of course material and create practices tailored to their capacities.
- They can help you gauge a potential hire’s abilities and characteristics, or even recognize employee training needs.
Types of online assessments
Online assessments are versatile as well, as they cater to different organizational needs and objectives. Here’s a quick look at the primary types:
Hiring and selection assessments
These are designed to bolster your recruitment efforts, as they gauge a candidate’s skills, competencies, and potential fit for a specific role. By tailoring such tests to a job’s requirements, you can objectively measure an individual’s technical, problem-solving, cognitive, and soft skills.
Some typical examples include:
- Technical skills tests: Such assessments examine one’s proficiency in specific tools or areas of expertise such as programming.
- Aptitude tests: These, on the other hand, measure abilities such as abstract reasoning, critical thinking, as well as numerical and verbal abilities.
- Situational judgment tests (SJTs): Seeing how applicants approach job-related scenarios is critical, and these evaluate their decision-making in such situations.
Performance management assessments
These examine an employee’s performance and identify areas that need improvement. To effectively utilize such assessments, however, they must be linked to a role’s key performance indicators (KPIs) and your organization’s goals.
The results of performance management assessments are also useful for skills gap analysis, which allows you to pinpoint areas where employees require upskilling—something especially helpful in dynamic industries.
Leadership and management assessments
To ensure long-term success, organizations must deeply understand leadership capabilities and managerial effectiveness. Evaluations that measure such aspects offer insights that can be used to guide an employee’s professional and personal development:
- Leadership inventories: These paint a picture of how executives approach their responsibilities, lead teams and projects, as well as maximize their skills. Take Profiles Asia Pacific’s (PAP) Executive Leadership Report as an example.
- 360-degree feedback: People Dynamics Inc.’s (PDI) 360 Degree PLUS Feedback System compares individual self ratings for leadership competencies to scores from peers, subordinates, and superiors.
Personality and behavioral assessments
An individual’s personality traits and behaviors influence their work style, preferences, and cultural fit. Recognizing these, meanwhile, is critical to building cohesive teams and aligning employees with roles that suit their natural tendencies.
Tools that let you gauge such characteristics include:
- Big five personality tests: These measure an individual’s openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and emotional stability—aspects that give a glimpse of one’s moral principles. Our Profiles Ethics-Oriented Personality Assessment (PEOPA) does this seamlessly.
- Personality profiling tools: Such instruments gauge one’s interpersonal and communication skills, as well as team compatibility. PDI’s DISC Personality Profiler examines these aspects based on the DISC theory.
- Emotional intelligence (EI) assessments: These evaluate capabilities essential to effective collaboration and leadership—think of empathy, self-regulation, and social skills. Our EQ-i 2.0’s results, for instance, can be utilized for candidate selection, leadership development, team building, and more.
Benefits of online assessments
Now that you have a basic idea of online evaluations, we’ll walk you through how they can bolster your human resource (HR) efforts.
Efficiency and convenience
Instant feedback
Automated scoring systems are a key component of online assessments. Since they provide immediate results, you can streamline not only your recruitment, L&D, and OD processes, but your decision-making as well.
Cost-effectiveness
Additionally, online evaluations require less manpower and materials to administer. This means you save yourself from consuming resources typically needed for test creation, delivery, and grading.
Flexibility and accessibility
As learners and candidates can complete assessments anytime, anywhere, online platforms allow you to accommodate diverse timezones and geographic locations.
This scheduling flexibility is extremely beneficial, particularly for organizations with talent pools spread across the globe.
Enhanced security
Ensuring the integrity of your evaluation process is vital, especially when hiring or certifying talent. Online platforms make this possible, as they possess the following features:
Recorded assessment sessions
Advanced testing tools often have proctoring capabilities, whether they come in the form of video recording, screen monitoring, or behavior analysis supported by artificial intelligence (AI). These act as deterrents against cheating and ensure fairness.
Secure test environments
To mitigate the risks of malpractice during assessments, online platforms can employ randomized question sets, time limits, and access control.
Since learners and candidates have to share sensitive data as well, sophisticated testing platforms utilize encrypted data storage to ensure confidentiality.
Real-time data and analytics
With online assessments, data collection and analysis occurs in real-time, providing administrators instant insights into outcomes.
This improved tracking and reporting, meanwhile, allows employers to identify trends, skill gaps, and areas of improvement, informing strategic talent management and OD decisions. It supports targeted training programs and succession planning as well.
Objective decision-making
Since advanced testing platforms automate scoring and enable a data-driven approach, organizations will be able to hire, develop, and promote individuals without any biases. Objective insights on candidate abilities support your diversity initiatives as well.
Hiring precision
Pre-employment assessments let you pinpoint applicants whose skills, competencies, and personalities align with not only job requirements, but also your organization’s culture. As you have a clear idea of how well they’ll fit, you can enjoy better hiring results.
Scalability
Online platforms can accommodate large volumes of test-takers, making them suitable for organizations of all sizes. They can match fluctuating needs as well, whether it be seasonal hiring demands or a steady stream of examinees.
Due to this capability, you can maintain consistent evaluation standards across all learners and candidates.
Challenges of online assessments
Despite being supported by technology, however, online testing platforms aren’t completely free from issues.
Technical difficulties
Disruptions to your evaluation process, for instance, can stem from the following:
- Internet problems: Interruptions can occur due to unstable or slow connections, resulting in possible result invalidations and participant frustration. This becomes a barrier for regions with limited infrastructure as well.
- System glitches and downtime: Unplanned maintenance, software bugs, or server crashes can disrupt assessments. To avoid these, you must opt for platforms with minimal downtime and reliable customer support.
- Compatibility: This is key to a seamless process, as platforms that aren’t optimized for different devices or operating systems can give rise to technical challenges.
Digital divide
Not everyone has equal access to technology. Some test-takers, for instance, may not possess basic tools such as computers, tablets, smartphones, or a reliable internet connection.
This can potentially prevent capable individuals from undergoing a fair evaluation process and limit their opportunities.
Additionally, some participants might not have the digital literacy required to navigate online assessments. This can prove disadvantageous for older candidates or those from less tech-savvy backgrounds.
Use of AI
Although they greatly enhance efficiency, automated scoring systems and AI are driven by algorithms. This may result in a unique concern: how assessments can expose test-takers to the biases, values, assumptions of those who built them.
To circumvent such an issue, transparency in your decision-making processes is a must. Through clear communication, convey AI’s role in your evaluations and gain trust.
Resistance to change
The shift from traditional methods may be met with skepticism from stakeholders unfamiliar with digital platforms. HR teams, line managers, or senior leaders accustomed to pen and paper, for instance, may question the reliability of online assessments.
Quelling such pushback will require some change management initiatives, like a training and awareness program.
Understanding pen-and-paper assessments
At this point, you should have a clear understanding of online assessments. We’ll tackle their traditional counterparts next.
What are traditional pen-and-paper assessments?
Simply put, pen-and-paper assessments involve the manual completion of tests using physical materials like paper, pens, and pencils. They’re also often conducted in controlled environments such as classrooms, examination halls, or training rooms.
Although they’re simple and easy-to-administer, these evaluations heavily rely on human oversight.
Types of pen-and-paper assessments
As for the different types of traditional evaluations, they’re similar to the ones we discussed for online assessments. The key difference is how they’re administered.
Benefits of pen-and-paper assessments
Although it doesn’t lean on technology, pen-and-paper methods still offer upsides in various contexts.
Ease of use
Traditional assessments are simple to conduct and accomplish, making them a more accessible option for broader audiences. Pen-and-paper formats, especially in settings where digital tools are less common, offer more familiarity as well.
These types of evaluations are also straightforward, as administrators and test-takers don’t need to learn platforms that online ones would require. They even involve less preparation.
Tangibility
Unlike digital interfaces, physical test materials provide tactile experiences. Participants avoid distractions from notifications and screen fatigue as well, which allows them to focus better.
Not to mention, papers aren’t prone to the risks of data corruption, hacking, or accidental deletion, making them a reliable option for secure record-keeping.
Reduced technical issues
Since pen-and-paper assessments don’t lean on technology, they eliminate the technical pitfalls associated with digital platforms:
- Because they’re conducted offline, a loss in internet connectivity or system glitches is never an issue.
- Device compatibility isn’t a concern either, as physical tests don’t require gadgets. The need for software updates or possibility of hardware malfunctions is basically non-existent.
Accessibility for low-tech settings
Some organizations may operate in areas with limited infrastructure or access to digital instruments. In such cases, pen-and-paper assessments are a practical option, as they can be used in any setting.
Since those who lack access to computers, tablets, or smartphones can participate, this is a more inclusive method as well.
Challenges of pen-and-paper assessments
But, similar to their digital equivalents, pen-and-paper assessments still have their downsides.
Manual grading
Manual grading is a time-consuming process that requires the individual review of every response. Large-scale assessments with hundreds of participants, or more, generate work volumes that require extra manpower. This can result in a bottleneck that delays feedback.
Human error also gets thrown into the mix, especially for open-ended or essay-based questions that entail subjective answers.
Data management
Traditional assessments require physical storage space. Managing paper records can also be cumbersome and time-consuming. Keep in mind that real-time data isn’t an option with manual evaluations as well, which limits opportunities for immediate analysis and decision-making.
Identifying patterns among test-takers, such as skill gaps or strengths, is another challenge, as you lack the digital tools that aid this process.
Limited scalability
The challenges of manual grading compound as the number of test-takers increase. The extra resources required to accommodate numerous participants, for instance, may not be feasible during peak periods.
Costs
The reliance on manpower and physical materials for proper administration and grading often make pen-and-paper assessments more expensive. The additional personnel needed for larger-scale assessments, for example, heighten labor costs.
Manual grading processes can result in indirect costs as well, as they can impact the productivity of HR teams and veer their attention away from hiring or training interventions.
Online assessments vs. pen-and-paper: Which one should you choose?
Honestly speaking, the choice between online vs. pen-and-paper assessments depends on your organization’s needs and constraints. However, we do have some recommendations that can help you decide:
-
- Go digital for efficiency and easy data management: Online is ideal for organizations looking to modernize their talent management processes, optimize their efficiency, scale the evaluation process, and leverage analytics for their strategic decisions.
- Stick to traditional for simplicity and accessibility: Pen-and-paper is suitable for environments with limited technological access or that prefer a hands-on approach.
- Adopt a hybrid model when necessary: A combination of the two methods offers flexibility and inclusivity. For example, online can be used for mass recruitment, while pen-and-paper can cater to hands-on skill evaluations.
Wrapping up—Customization is a must for a seamless assessment process
Rather than viewing online and pen-and-paper assessments as mutually exclusive, you should evaluate your organization’s needs and tailor your approach:
- Consider your test-takers: Are they digitally literate or located in areas with limited access to technology? Are you evaluating applicants or current employees?
- Scale: How many people are you assessing and how quickly do you need results?
- Resources: Can your organization support online platforms or afford the requirements of manual assessments?
Then, by weighing the benefits and drawbacks of online vs. pen-and paper as well, you can create an evaluation strategy that drives informed HR decisions and long-term success.
If you want to modernize your processes or need a custom solution, look into PDI’s Assessment Development Services. We can design and administer valid and reliable tests that not only align with your requirements, but also deliver the best results. To learn more, simply reach out!